Guess What: There is no ‘right’ to collective bargaining

4

There is no right to collective bargaining
David Denholm | The Washington Examiner
Feb. 21, 2011

Protesters in Madison, Wis., and Columbus, Ohio, are defending the “right to collective bargaining.” Guess what? There is no right to collective bargaining. Collective bargaining is a legislated privilege given to unions by friendly lawmakers.

The federal courts have been very clear on this. A federal district court in North Carolina put it quite eloquently in a decision upholding the Tar Heel States law prohibiting public-sector bargaining, saying, “All citizens have the right to associate in groups to advocate their special interests to the government. It is something entirely different to grant any one interest group special status and access to the decision-making process.”

A law granting public-sector unions monopoly bargaining privileges gives a union, a special interest group, two bites at the apple. First, it uses its political clout to elect public officials. Then it negotiates with the very same officials.

When you consider that between 70 and 80 percent of all local government expenditures are personnel costs, you begin to get an idea of the magnitude of the power such laws give unions.

Not only is there no right to collective bargaining in public employment, it is wrong. Collective bargaining distorts and corrupts democratic government.

Collective bargaining is a process for employer-employee relations that was designed for the private sector. This process served as the model for the development of public-sector collective bargaining without taking into account the fundamental differences between the two sectors.

Read more @ Washington Examiner.

4 COMMENTS

  1. But it is a right. Under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights – Article 23- it states that workers have the right to join unions. Check it out

    • According to the UN, it is also a right to have a home. Correct?

      Provided by whom?

      When one says there is a “right” to something (anything), the secondary question that must be asked is: Does this so called “right” take from someone else?

      If one party chooses not to collectively bargain, but a government forces that party to bargain, is it really bargaining? Or is it the infringement upon another’s rights?

      I want to buy your property, but you do not want to sell. You have the right to say no. If I get the government to step between us and force your to negotiate with me because it is my “right” to bargain with you, is that now bargaining–or something else?

    • The poll was very ncliey worded to get the desired response. Replace "public workers" with "government workers" and the poll results might have quite different.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here