I will be agreeing with Lord Russell’s views that the cosmological argument has a few inherent problems and contradictions that are difficult to overcome. To conclude, the Cosmological argument is an a posteriori argument whose aim is to attempt to prove the existence of God. Both the Kalam cosmological argument and those of St. Thomas Aquinas attempt to prove this existence through reductio ad absurdum means, demonstrating that without a first cause, the present state would be impossible. Kalam Cosmological Argument Essay 1009 Words | 5 Pages. 1. Forms of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The cosmological argument is a well established argument for the existence of God and it is also known as the first cause argument. The argument is stated thus: the world (or universe) exists, and since it exists, there must have been a cause for its existence; therefore, some being, namely God, must have created it. Philosopher’s Argument from Contingency Essay type Argumentative The cosmological argument attempts to prove that God exists by stating that there ought to be an ultimate origin of all things. In this essay, I will be examining the different views pertaining to the cosmological argument for the existence of God as discussed by Bertrand Russell and Fr. The cosmological argument has many variations of which only one will be explored in the following paragraphs. The … Cosmological Argument For The Existence Of God Essay. Similar to the ontological argument, the cosmological argument, also known as the first cause argument, is a classical argument for the existence of God. The first premise being that everything which begins to exist requires a cause. The cosmological argument is based upon the belief that there is a first cause behind the existence of universe and this was God. The cosmological argument is less a particular argument than an argument type. However, unlike the ontological argument, it derives the conclusion that God exists from a posterior premise (with evidence), as it is based on what can be seen in the world and the universe. The Cosmological Argument as proof of God The Cosmological Argument is born out of premise that the world must have a cause and a reason for existing. The second premise is the universe began to exist. The cosmological argument Essay The cosmological argument refers to a theoretical squabble for the subsistence of God which elucidates that everything has a cause. The cosmological argument for God’s existence has been called the empiricists’ form of argument. Craig’s “Kalam Cosmological Argument” is based on three main premises. The word ‘cosmos’ comes the Greek word meaning concerned with cause. Cosmological argument, Form of argument used in natural theology to prove the existence of God. Copleston. Clarke’s Cosmological Argument Essay (Critical Writing) Introduction The cosmological argument presented by Clarke differs quite significantly from that provided by other well known philosophers even though all of these arguments are based on the fact that every being has a cause. This is because it starts on the basis of human encounter with the physical universe. The cosmological argument is an a posteriori argument based on the question of the relation of the universe’s existence and. Thomas Aquinas, in his Summa theologiae, presented two versions of the cosmological argument: the first-cause argument and the argument from contingency.The first-cause argument begins with the fact that there is change in the world, and a change is always the effect of some cause or causes. There are forms of this argument in the philosophies of Plato and Aristotle.