Anyhow both these desktops actually come with a rich desktop right … Xfce brings more friendliness and gives a more full-desktop experience. Lxpanel solves  a lot  problems with openbox for newbies.I probably lose my interest in Crunch if it turns away from Openbox. Au lieu d'installer un environnement de bureau complet, vous pouvez choisir le gestionnaire de fenêtres. From the terminal, issue the following command: user $ killall xfwm4 ; openbox & exit. It was fun at first but now I just want something that works out of box. But, whatever the case, you might want to draw up a list of must-have … There is also an element of ease of use. Qu'ils utilisent un ordinateur ancien et lent et ont juste besoin d'en tirer le meilleur parti, ou s'ils utilisent un tout nouveau système hautes performances et veulent consacrer toute cette … Benchmark: Memory Usage: LXQt desktop environment vs XFCE. In theory, GNOME apps probably run slower under Xfce, but because Xfce is generally faster, you are unlikely to notice the difference. Put bluntly, LXDE looks basic. Fortunately, Xfce compensates for this lack by running GNOME apps almost as well as GNOME itself. In a fresh boot, CPU usage is the same at around 1 percent, but LXDE uses a paltry 219 MB RAM, whereas XFCE uses 465 MB RAM. Openbox has a steeper learning curve, in so much as it is considerably different in scope than Windows. Anyway, I updated the info in my internal database (brain) and added to mental RAM (can lose it at any moment) -- LOL! becomes a debian testing build for the next release, there is also a chance it may switch to XFCE. Compton: This compositing manager can be used in complement of Marco, Metacity, Xfwm4 or Openbox. I have come to love that personalizable desktop menu in openbox so much that I can't live without it. Xfce vs MATE. In Logiciels libres. This is especially the case if Xfce is run without the Xfce goodies meta plugin package (I only run a  couple of extra plugins). I was going to give up, and you gave me the exact answers. LTS strategy. Unlike LXQt, you will find a lot of major Linux distributions support XFCE editions. Proudly powered by Debian. Though XFCE4 is an excellent desktop environment, it’s window manager isn’t as great. LXDE was once my favorite, but don't use anymore. free. The most important reason people chose i3 is: One of the biggest attractions of i3 is … It is possible to use Openbox as the window manager inside of KDE by simply editing the ~/.xinitrcfile, and replacing the current exec command with the following: Now when issuing startxusers will see KDE, but instead of KWin, they will have the custo… Re: Openbox vs XFCE? XFCE's window manager though isn't bad, a little less configurable and less flexible key bindings than Openbox. X86 architecture is … However, Xfce is flexible and powerful enough to satisfy my needs as a power user. raw download clone embed print report. i3 vs Openbox. You are allowed to change the icon library and fonts in Gnome and XFCE. I'm curious about how Mint has modified Xfce to make it as awesome as I've heard. i3, Cinnamon, and KDE are probably your best bets out of the 6 options considered. What's the more selfish thing to do - (a) try it yourself (which takes what... 2 minutes?) Trixar_za on "xfce vs openbox" @ms3811, thank you so much for your response, even when the question was asked in a non-related topic forum. So my question is, what are the differences between openbox and xfce, with regards to performance?Even if #! It  's difficult to pinpoint what it is in Openbox what I like so much. It would be no surprise that I prefer Xfce at the moment For me the configurability of Xfce and its ease of use outweigh any speed benefits that may come from using Openbox. Le meilleur environnement de bureau Linux Lean vs LXDE vs Xfce vs MATE. tags: Enlightenment Openbox XFCE. Link_ 2 avril 2009 à 19:59:36. I, by myself, actually run GNOME, KDE, and XFCE on my computers in my office and home. LXQt/LXDE vs. Xfce. OpenBox est un environnement de bureau ultra léger, au même titre que Fluxbox ou Xfce. Not a member of Pastebin yet? If you want something more user-friendly and with fancy menus, go with XFCE. Specs. Si tu sais Votre chemin vers Linux Ensuite, vous pouvez Créez votre propre système En utilisant les ingrédients que vous voulez. Make a backup of your Openbox installation, then install XFCE and if you don't like it, you can restore your Openbox setup easily enough. level 2 Currently PCLOS Openbox on one laptop, have to update hardware on the D630, it appears, but has Salix64 xfce … Manjaro community also maintains ISO for MATE, Cinnamon, LXDE, LXQt, OpenBox and more. Each desktop experience can offer something that is a bit useful to me and may help me to use each machine as I see that it is fit. Such differences might matter immensely if you are a compulsive customizer, or not at all if you tend to accept your desktop environment the way you find it. Xfce uses less resources, but this advantage begins to break down as you install and run apps that depend on GNOME libraries. Server: acrobat, Enter your search query in the box above ^, I was using Openbox for some time but I returned to XFCE. My Rec ommendation for Openbox. I was using xfburn as burning software, thunar as a file manager (basically for the volume manager) And I like how quickly apps load on XFCE. Openbox is faster, configurable, simply like it better. 1. For features Xfce does have more GUI tools though I still prefer Openbox. It should be noted that Openbox is actually a window manager and must be used in conjunction with one of the desktop environments listed above. It is written from the scratch. that will tell you more in 10 minutes than you'll find out from what anyone else says about it. The best I've seen so far has been the LXDE spin of Fedora 12, and I am not normally a fan of Fedora. All. Whereas, community edition are supported by open source enthusiasts … This is where I really begin to see the differences between these two systems. :D. May 12, 2012 at 7:12 AM Openbox. I started out using fluxbox, then changed to openbox. When I right-click on the Desktop I could see the standard menu (e.g. With enough effort, Xfce can feel like a more modern desktop environment. You certainly can use Openbox in Xfce as the window manager. Previous … This page is powered by a knowledgeable community that helps you make an informed decision. I then proceed to log out, checking the box as instructed, and log back in. Manjaro: Xfce vs Openbox (packages) soldier9599. XFCE I found frustrating re: panel. Xfce is an environment you can scale up or down to fit your tastes. Its lightweight construction conserves both memory and CPU cycles. For me personally, I prefer openbox because the only thing I miss with it is drive icons on the desktop. For such … Re: Openbox vs XFCE? sticks with openbox, users may wish to go omn's route. 2. Vraiment, quand il s'agit de MATE vs Xfce, vous êtes du genre à se faire couper les cheveux. If you want something minimalistic, go with Openbox. Bash 8.10 KB . Seriously, just try it, it's hardly difficult to install and have a play. When I run: I'd be interested as to how Xfce performs with older machines as I run fairly recent hardware and in this scenario the speed difference is negligible. I have read that the best implementation of Xfce yet in a Debian-based distro is Linux Mint 7's Xfce community edition. The script … Manjaro also offers GNOME and KDE Plasma variants. They configure a very nice OpenBox and you can see the tools they provide for it and Tint2. With the final release of Fedora 24 arriving on Tuesday, I've installed each of the six desktops on a … If you want something minimalistic, go with Openbox. I combine Openbox with the XFCE panel . Xfce vs. MATE. All of them offer sophisticated point-and-click graphical user interfaces (GUI) which are on par with the desktop environments found in Windows and Mac OS X. Cinnamon, Openbox, Awesome, BSPWM, Budgie, MATE and i3 are Manjaro community editions; The official/ flagship editions are supported by the core team of Manjaro Linux. For me, I have a soft spot in my heart for the XFCE … MATE comes with more features than Xfce. Although it has been few years that I have used Xfce to be honest (I came across it around early 2005 if I remember correctly). It all depends on what compromise you want. If you need a performance-centric desktop environment without needing advanced customizations, Xfce is a great choice to go with. Xfce with Openbox takes less than a minute to set up and functions almost completely glitch-free. Openbox may be a bit lighter in memory usage though both are snappy. ... and if anybody has heared of an attempt to do that, might be just a dream cause I like XFCE but do not want to miss my right-click menu. Debian is a registered trademark of Software in the Public Interest, Inc. My core OS is LinuxMint-8 with Xfce. On the other hand, Openbox uses a very little amount of memory and is very minimalistic (as a DE). 535 . And I'm testing the new Xubuntu-Lucid Lynx 10.04 Alpha 2 That means installing Openbox won't give you easy menu access to wallpaper options, a taskbar or system panel, or most of those other doo-dads. If you are feeling adventurous and want to install additional DEs or WMs you can reference these guides: Install Desktop Environments and Window Managers I like both. I like the features Openbox provides (especially the pipe menus), so it looks like a great marriage to me . I like that its menu and WM features are very customizable. I missed the topic-add new button, paying not to much attention to it. And then there's just these small differences in how Xfce and LXDE (and LXQt) function. Including: Awesome, bspwm, Budgie, Cinnamon, Deepin, i3, LXDE, LXQt, MATE, and Openbox. However, MATE is also less customizable than Xfce. Performance wise, I notice no real difference between it and Openbox on my machine, and it comes with more built in tools and simple GUIs that small changes that need to be made can be handled a little quicker (for me). Cinnamon, Openbox, Awesome, BSPWM, Budgie, MATE and i3 are Manjaro community editions; The official/ flagship editions are supported by the core team of Manjaro Linux. When I do this, Xfce flickers for a moment as the terminal closes and sends me back to the desktop, but nothing has changed. Enjoy! Specs. With XFCE, you can have those BUT at the cost of the deskmenu. So, the XFCE is the best desktop, right? If you can live without those, Openbox just … ” i3 is ranked 1st while Openbox is ranked 4th. Xfce. ☁️ Get $100 in credit toward deploying your very own Linux servers on Linode! Again, very customizable and fast. We can say that this desktop environment looks like Windows 10, and for daily use we recommend you to use Cinnamon version for modern computer. But, I mostly, use my own version of Debian Squeeze 'testing' with Xfce. LXQt and LXDE are lighter than Xfce, but that’s only part of the story. Enlightenment vs Openbox. Xfce - Less resource-hungry than GNOME or KDE, Xfce is a great choice for older computers, and it is still a full-fledged desktop environment that offers a great deal to the user. Got Leenucks? The Xfce in Manjaro looks good thanks to the customization. to report on my mistake, I must have had a bad … I've recently installed oS 12.2 in an old celeron test machine, so that I chose LXDE. Bonjour, Je vais réinstaller mon Laptop sous Archlinux ce week end, et j'hésite à propos du choix de l'environnement de bureau :S J'hésite en fait par rapport à ce qui serait le … The Xfce desktop is thin and fast with an overall elegance that makes it easy to figure out how to do things. Also it feels more complete, I don't have to build my desktop myself. So i ask, how are memory usage, and cpu usage in this regard.Also any other little comments you have would be nice to hear (such as why you prefer one to another). Last edited by pablokal (2010-03-01 21:42:01). Actually I used LXQt on my Raspberry Pi instead and it works flawlessly. Copyright © 2012 CrunchBang Linux. Never . or (b) make a post asking everyone else to do a comparison for you, which is entirely subjective and has no guarantee of being in accord with what your own opinions would be. To use Xfce4 with Openbox, first start a normal Xfce session, and open up a terminal. By native window tiling I mean that we will be using only the native commands of a particular window manager and not any external program. So, you'll have to ask yourself what do you want. There was an option in the menu to switch to "openbox" so I did that to see what happened. I should have set more test partitions, but didn't, and I'm seeing many posts of people using XFCE, but I don't have a machine available right now to test it. If that is not enough, Manjaro community maintains Awesome, Bspwm, Budgie, Cinnamon, i3, LXDE, LXQt, MATE and Openbox. In the next boot, boot to "default". 214 29 . Or try both and choose, Last edited by jotapesse (2010-03-01 15:38:14). Currently PCLOS Openbox on one laptop, have to update hardware on the D630, it appears, but has Salix64 xfce on it at the moment. Xfce embodies the traditional UNIX philosophy of modularity and re-usability. It aims to be fast and low on system resources, while still being visually appealing and user friendly. Second, exit out of the Xfce session, and make sure to tick the checkbox that says "Save session for future login." The most popular desktop environments in Linux are GNOME, Unity, Cinnamon, MATE, KDE, Xfce, and LXDE. The next time you log into XFCE, you’ll be using OpenBox as your window manager instead of XFWM4. Who is this doin' this synthetic type of alpha beta psychedelic funkin'? Doesn't work out so well. There is no noticeable difference between both openbox or xfwm, both are fast and efficient, small memory footprint, performance wise, perhaps openbox is slightly lighter. Linux Mint MATE. Published: dim. Hosted by Linode. Pros. In its default appearance, the newly-released Xfce … Openbox has that ultimate simpleness and straightforwardness.The keyboard use which makes it really fast and snappy.I miss in the comment of oms and core about xfce what they like about it, except configurability and ease of use.But why is that an issue for you who keep tinkering all the time?What are the problems there in Openbox?LXDE is very interesting too. One function only, but does it as well as it possibly can. See More. I really have no complaints about it, but I'm interested in trying something new. This is especially the case if Xfce is run without the Xfce goodies meta plugin package (I only run a couple of extra plugins). For example, you may compare lxpanel to xfce4-panel, pcmanfm to thunar, lxrandr to xfce4-display-settings and so on... Openbox with the right utilities, tint2, gmrun, etc., like current #!, is very nice and very light, but not the same desktop experience. not a rig just to play with) is XFCE. You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason: Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features! Easy to maintain but can also be customised to some extent if needed. I've noticed a lot of members have switched over to xfce with an openbox feel on debian testing via omn's DTX. Linux Mint with KDE plasma is the best choice for computer or laptop with the high specification. From their official website, we got some comparison point like this : MATE: Stable, robust, traditional; XFCE: Light, simple, efficient; Cinnamon : Sleek, modern, innovative; KDE: Solid, full-featured, polished; 1. Related Posts . XFCE I found frustrating re: panel. It uses the GTK+ toolkit, just like the more popular GNOME interface that serves as the default for Ubuntu and Fedora (two of the largest Linux-based desktops out there). It seems to have a single app for everything, and nothing really overlaps. However, Xfce does not use Openbox as the window manager when I do this. Now, you could compare LXDE to Xfce. Installation procedure In the question“What are the best window managers for Linux? Xfce can also surprise you with features like custom actions in the file manager. Openbox is a window manager, XFCE is a desktop environment, how can you compare those? This makes it ideal for older hosts with few resources to spare for a desktop. It's a nice DE, very adequate. I tested Xubuntu Lucid for several weeks, but the demands on my bandwidth were threatening a FAP violation, so I had to quit. License: GPL 2.0 (or later) Programming Language: C. Available on: ArchBang, … I think the big contender right now is XFCE, but I was wondering if anyone has experience with both and can maybe compare the two? LXDE was once my favorite, but don't use anymore. That's all they give you for a text editor. In Linux, there are so many choices, and this includes the desktop environments and window managers. Partage [AIDE] Choix entre Openbox et XFCE. What Xfwm has over it, is more options in a GUI (rather than in a config file) and tiling windows by dragging them into screen corners. I would assume that you're running Openbox in the first place because you're a minimalist?Here's how it goes for me: *Install Archlinux*Install Openbox*Wonder if I would want more features of _____ DE*Install XFCE, GNOME, or KDE*Cry at bloat*Remove XFCE, GNOME, or KDE*Install Openbox. A DE is a bunch of small programs trying to do many things, with a lot of redundancy. :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! These two lists show packages that are exclusive to the Xfce and Openbox versions of Manjaro, relative to each other. The difference is on behaviour and philosophy. In my opinion, Xfce provides a nice balance between functionality and conservation of system resources, while … Linux Mint 17.3 will receive security updates until 2019. Openbox is only responsible for maintaining the windows you open on your screen -- nothing else. Check out a CrunchBang 8.04 Live CD... it has both Openbox and Xfce desktops, so you can do a true "A/B test" with the same kernel, applications, etc. Older laptops with … So long story short, I prefer openbox for what most are sure to deem a silly reason, but that's just me . XFCE, KDE, Cinnamon, Budgie and Gnome are Beginner Friendly. or use the. There is no noticeable difference between both openbox or xfwm, both are fast and efficient, small memory footprint, performance wise, perhaps openbox is slightly lighter. LXDE vs Xfce Let's have a look at the desktops... Xfce desktop... LXDE desktop... Now as you can see the desktops look a lot similar. Somebody completely unfamiliar with Linux can sit down and muddle through XFCE with minimal issues. Xfce is light on resources but proves to provide a feature-rich user experience. ^ you know what they say about great minds thinking alike, well, in this case it must of been a fluke! The difference is on behaviour and philosophy. Things like log-out, shutdown, etc in openbox root menu are formulated for lxsession. By terminating Xfdesktop… In my opinion, Xfce provides a nice balance between functionality and conservation of system resources, while still having a beautiful desktop.