A second reason why the American Civil War was necessary was because our country needed both the South and North regions to survive. Slavery was legal in the North well into the conflict. 1. I also believe that the South, given time, would have ended slavery on it's own if they had won the war, but one state at a time as the constitution directs. They hoped to be treated as equal citizens who could vote, gain an education and live peacefully and equally with the whites. This war lasted from 1861-1865 and divided the nation into the “north” and the “south”. Next both sides would have kept or got ride of slavery to end the war. We, Too, Sing America! The primary cause of the war was the status of slavery in the nation and its newly acquired territories. 150 Years After Fort Sumter: Why We're Still Fighting the Civil War North and South shared the burden of slavery, and after the war, they shared in forgetting about it. The education system in the South had virtually disappeared, along with the old plantation system. The South was fed up with the Union because of the corruptness that was sinking into the federal government. In 2011, South Sudan gained independence from Sudan, marking an end to Africa's longest-running civil war. The South has a Constitutional Right to leave the United States of America (States Rights, Secession). Paul also fails to bring up the fact that it was the South that started the war by attacking the North in 1861. Not only did they oppress African-Americans, but also, lower class whites. The Civil War was about just one states' right: the right to own slaves. This all comes from the basic understanding of a fundamental principle stated by Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence, Originally taken from the philosopher John Lock. In the years after the civil war, white southerners followed Lee’s cue, telling an emotionally powerful story of a heroic and noble struggle against overwhelming odds. The two sides involved in the American Civil War were the Union, ... which represented the South. There were two sides; North and South. The Civil War profoundly shaped the United States as we know it today. Students of all age groups know at least something about this war. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so." He's trying to demonstrate that the South has no power that can prevent the North from prevailing in this war. Everyone knows what the American Civil War was all about, right? Ron Paul is a neo-Confederate, and proud member of the Ludwig Von Mises Institute, which has been labeled as a neo-Confederate organization. Fact #1: The Civil War was fought between the Northern and the Southern states from 1861-1865. The North was a greatly industrialized zone at the time, while the South was exceedingly agricultural. Abraham Lincoln started the war by sending soldiers in to another country (Fort Sumter) because he wanted to preserve the Union. Civil War wasn't to end slavery Purposes: The South fought to defend slavery. Protectionist tariffs was another item the Confederate Constitution banned, Something the northern states desperately wanted because of the industrial advantage over the agricultural South. To win the war, the South had only to survive. The South’s opposition to states’ rights is not surprising. An extensive amount of effort has gone into studying the American Civil War. In part, this was the result of the war strategies of both sides. The North and its troops originally fought because they felt the South had no legal right to secede from the Union and was close to treason. They were victims of discrimination by the upper class whites too. Does it really matter that less than 15% of the Southern whites owned slaves.? Cotton was a huge export earner for the US, North and south. The main objective was to save the union. The Civil War in the United States began in 1861, after decades of simmering tensions between northern and southern states over slavery, states’ rights and westward expansion. The Civil War (1861–1865) was the bloodiest war in American history. The very issue that created the Confederacy helped to destroy it. Do you believe the South was in the wrong in the Civil War? In any case, the rational for saying that states rights was the cause of the Civil War was wrong. The Civil War erupted from a variety of long-standing tensions and disagreements about American life and politics. It was the Confederate Constitution that banned the over sea slave trade, Not the U. S. Constitution. The North and the South went to war for very different reasons. I respect the Confederates for their determination and great fighting skills, but I do not believe their cause was Just. The South was fighting for a number of things. It was the Confederacy that paid its black soldiers equal wages, Not the northern army. The Civil War had a huge effect on the United States of America, but especially on the former Confederacy in the South of the country. Like Reply. The victorious North rewrote history to justify its invasion of the South, which was legally and culturally a separate, independent country… The Civil War was a series of battles between the North and the South over issues such as slavery and states' rights. What has not been discussed in this too much was the British aristocracy’s (and rumoured royal) hidden support for the CSA and desire to go to their aid. Thats all I got. Here are ten basic facts you need to know about America's defining struggle. 20 Tweets Dragging Roseanne Barr To A White Privilege Hell, Top 10 Most Politically Significant Bob Marley Songs, Nina Simone To Billie Holiday: 10 Civil Rights Protest Songs. The South was desperate for British intervention. The nation was shattered into North and South by blue and gray. The South’s inner civil war not only helped weaken the Confederate war effort but bequeathed to Reconstruction explosive political issues, unresolved questions, and broad opportunities for change. Unfortunately, that success was achieved through the exploitation of millions of slaves, many of whom were brought to the United States against their will and then abused, tortured and killed in the name of building the South. Most importantly the War for Southern Independence expressed the inviolable right of the people to be self-governing. north, the Union wins the civil war, seemingly beating the much weaker south quickly and easily, to the clueless onlooker, but the war was very hard fought through deadly battles and bloodshed, with both sides coming close to beating each other out, at one point or another. Slavery undermines the rights and freedoms due to all humans. It arose out of disputes over slavery and states’ rights. 2:when is slavery ever right in the entire universe. Ron Paul was also was the only member of congress to vote against honoring the Civil Rights Act Of 1964 on its 40th anniversary in 2004. The South in reality was trying to assert it’s own authority over the North with the Fugitive Slave acts or the ruling of the Dread Scott decision. People believe that the war happened keeping in view of the rights of the Southern nationals. Paul would also claim that he wouldn’t have voted for it at the time, putting him on the side of the racists in both the fight against slavery and the fight against Jim Crow segregation, the two defining struggles of Black people in America. Recent Developments. Abraham Lincoln commonly made racist remarks about blacks and actually said that he was really concerned that the Union be preserved. In many ways, the North and South were fighting for the same thing in the Civil War: their right to maintain a way of life that worked for them. The basic reason why the South wanted to win in the American Civil War was so that they could govern themselves. Then after they took office they managed to pass Jim Crow laws and Black Codes. The Civil War profoundly shaped the United States as we know it today. Saying the Confederate States of America fought the entire war for slavery is as ludicrous as it is naively biased. First, the South couldn’t have won the civil war because state’s rights prevented unification of the South. If Lee was right, historians need not look south of the Mason-Dixon line to explain the war’s outcome: the answer is simply the old story of the biggest battalions winning. They caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of young men. Historians looked more closely at slavery, and saw a rapidly expanding, even thriving, system. The American Civil War started on April 12, 1861 from open fire on Fort Sumter, and took place all across America. There is no reason to believe that the South was right in their position. It has become an accepted historical fact that the South could not have won the American Civil War. I'm not here to address an argument over whether the South could have won the War. Many of the monuments’ defenders have claimed that the Civil War was not about slavery but instead about states’ rights. … Here he is giving a speech in front of a giant Confederate Flag about why he believes the North was wrong in the Civil War and why the South was right. Several Ron Paul supporters have asked that the video be taken down, from the pro-Confederate channel, Patriot Review but Patriot Review believes that the video could help Paul win South Carolina. ... Before the war, South Carolina did more than any other Southern state to advance the notion that a state had the right to nullify federal laws, and even to secede from the United States. T he South saw President Lincoln as a threat to their way of life and upon his election, South Carolina immediately seceded and many other states followed. The south seceded from the Union and fought the Civil War, not to uphold states’ rights, but to defend slavery. South wanted to keep slavery, but North opposed slavery and thought it was not right. The two sides involved in the American Civil War were the Union, which represented the North, and the Confederacy, which represented the South. There were numerous reason behind why each side's soldiers fought for one side or the other. The north trampled all over the south, by taxing their goods, restricting their congressional powers, and forcing the northern way of life on the south. The South had prospered in the 1850s, like the North, and when a financial panic had struck in 1857 the South, unlike the North, had largely escaped its effects. In the video he claims that the North should have paid to buy slaves from southern slave owners to avoid the war, rather than the South renouncing slavery. That was the "states rights" they were fighting for. Yes, I do, The federal government had no buiseness screwing with the economy of states whom they did not know enough about to pass judgment on. Ron Paul has made no secret the fact that he thought that the South was right in the Civil War. It is almost impossible to imagine the Civil War erupting without the passions aroused among Northern abolitionists and those in the South who saw slave-holding as central to their way of life. The Consent of the Governed. Did the North care about abolishing slavery? But two years later, violent conflict broke out after political disagreement between President Salva Kiir and former Vice President Riek Machar and the fighting continues to this day. Despite being Michigan-born—and living, at various times, in the East and Midwest—I grew up hearing this claim. The agrarian system has worked very well for the South and made it very wealthy. But it is erroneous to say that the death and mayhem of the "Civil War" (or revolution of 1863 as I prefer to call it) was all for the preservation of the institution of slavery. Second, they were traitors and rebels which is unacceptable considering all the violence and destruction their war caused. Not surprisingly, in the south there were high levels of discontent, which came to a head in 1955-1972 with the First Sudanese Civil War, then again in the Second Sudanese Civil War … Jefferson Davis himself actually wrote in letter to his wife that slave property in the South would "eventually be lost. " Like a massive earthquake, the Civil War and the destruction of slavery permanently altered the landscape of Southern life, exposing and widening fault lines that had lain barely visible just beneath the surface. The south's main purpose was to keep their slaves. Did the South secede because of slavery? Secession was based on the idea of state rights (or "states rights," a variant that came into use after the Civil War). General Lee expected Slavery to end on its own. The Union definitely had a significant advantage with a higher population, more industry, and a more massive army. American Civil War - American Civil War - The land war: The first military operations took place in northwestern Virginia, where nonslaveholding pro-Union Virginians sought to secede from the Confederacy. Many people still do not believe that Civil war occurred because of slavery. By the civil-rights era, historical interpretations of the war were shifting. This is why our founding fathers led a revolution against the British, And I would remind JMan that realistically they were "rebels" guilty of treason against the king. The effects stem way past wanting slaves just cause the have no rights and they wanted to own. Yes, slavery was an evil that needed to be abolished but, according to the constitution, that was a decision to be made at a state level. The Civil War was absolutely about slavery. The Civil War is a well-known war taught in every school. First and foremost, Allowing a constitutional way of getting rid of something that was, Economically speaking, Impossible at the time while ensuring the sovereign responsibilities of states. When Lincoln, who opposed slavery, was elected president, this caused conflict with the South, who viewed slavery as a way of life. Fact #1: The Civil War was fought between the Northern and the Southern states from 1861-1865. Southern cotton production in 1870 was half what it was in 1860. What if the South won the Civil War? They viewed the North as Tyrannical, Imposing taxation and unfair legislation that hurt the South financially. People take the Civil War three ways ONE: Your with the South and your racistTWO:Your not with the South and you take racism the wrong way and you act racist like XXX THREE:Your with the North and you hate slavery. The problem is that he stopped the rebellion by force-not negotiation. The confederates could never have been considered the good guys in the civil war.They supported slavery which many would consider one of the worse sins ever and they wanted to split the union up which could also be considered a pretty bad sin considering it was important to Lincoln that the union stay together. American Civil War, four-year war (1861–65) fought between the United States and 11 Southern states that seceded to form the Confederate States of America. Do I think Northern 'Bullying' tactics such as tariffs and taxes was wrong? The ensuing Civil War (1861–65) wrought immense destruction on much of the South, which emerged the loser in the conflict. The real issue was the South was an oligarchy of big land owners that ruled unfairly. In this kind of war, the ability to mobilize economic resources, the effectiveness of political leadership, and a society’s willingness to keep up the fight despite setbacks, are as crucial to the outcome as success or failure on the battlefields. Thank you. The Civil War was in reality the War for Southern Independence - freedom from rigid economic controls by northern industrialists who influenced government - NOT an issue of slavery. They are nothing if not predictable. First off, they supported Slavery which is in itself morally wrong. The Civil War ended in December 1865, and the slaves were free. If slavery was the main issue, than why didn't the North make slavery illegal and then go to war in order to support the law? Thank you for hearing me out and may God bless you all. The state’s casus belli was neither vague nor hard to comprehend : It was fought because the Southern States had left the Union. The Civil War and its aftermath of hyper-federalism masked why the Deep South began secession after Lincoln's election in 1860. The South’s inner civil war reflected how wartime events and Confederate policies eventually reacted upon the region’s distinctive social and political structure. The … During the civil war in the United States, southern states fought to maintain the right to keep slaves, while the north and the President fought to release them to freedom. If they do take it down,  Charles Johnson at Little Green Footballs has downloaded a copy of the video. In this lesson, we'll look at the notion of states' rights and their role in the United States Civil War, as well as some examples of how states' rights were invoked regarding the question of slavery. In 1863 Lincoln abolished slavery in the South. When antislavery candidate Abraham Lincoln was elected president (1860), the Southern states seceded. There is no reason to believe that the South was right in their position. If he can march right through the heart of … Civil War to Civil Rights - Summary Report Civil War to Civil Rights Commemoration - Summary Report One hundred-fifty years ago, competing visions for the country and conflicting definitions of freedom led to a war that threatened the very existence of the United States. So what was it all about? There were numerous reason behind why each side's soldiers fought for one side or the other. Report Post. 1 The War for States' Rights: Secession Crisis ; 2 National Constitution Center: Ron Paul: Secession is right, Civil War maybe not ; 3 John's History Vortex: The Legality of Secession in the United States ; 4 The Washington Post: Five myths about why the South seceded ; 5 The Post and Courier: History shows secession was about slavery The North and its troops originally fought because they felt the South had no legal right to secede from the Union and was close to treason. Had very little to do with slavery and everything to do with money and power. Reasons for Civil War. Before the war, the South’s economy had been based almost strictly on agriculture, mainly cotton, tobacco, and sugar, and all these industries suffered, especially cotton. The South definitely won the Civil War. McClellan, in command of Federal forces in southern Ohio, advanced on his own initiative in the early summer of 1861 into western Virginia with about 20,000 men. What caused the Civil War? Until the Civil War, Southern presidents and lawmakers had dominated the federal government. The South’s opposition to states’ rights is not surprising. During the Civil War, the North and South had several different views on the way of life. This war is often described as "the bloodiest war," and many soldiers fought in the Civil War. Forcing people to do what you want, Whipping them when they don't, Barely having enough to survive, It's just pure wrong doing that sort of actuions. Copyright © 2020 Interactive One, LLC. The war was due to withdrawing of them from the Union. Therefore they have the same right to break the political bonds which tied them to the union. The war did not start because of slavery, it was a war for states rights. Ron Paul Was Implicated In Failed White Supremacist Island Invasion, Top 10 Racist Ron Paul Friends, Supporters. Do I think the war was about slavery? After all, they were the same states that decided to accept the constitution and the authority of the federal government. Since civil war broke out in South Sudan in December 2013, over 50,000 people have been killed—possibly as many as 383,000, according to a recent estimate—and nearly … Since civil war broke out in South Sudan in December 2013, over 50,000 people have been killed—possibly as many as 383,000, according to a … It was not because Lincoln had … It arose out of disputes over slavery and states’ rights. 2 The confederacy was GOOD!! Most importantly the War for Southern Independence expressed the inviolable right of the people to be self-governing. The South was Right. This exalted the powers of the individual states as opposed to those of the Federal government. the south wanted more individual state rights,some wanted slavery,and some wanted to secede.But slavery wasn't the main reason for the civil war They wanted to preserve Slavery to maintain their way of life as well as their economy, However, As history has proved time and again, A country cannot succeed off of slavery, So it would have been abolished anyways. It’s a pervasive myth, even outside the Old Confederate South. Their well-researched arguments demonstrate the South's many legitimate complaints during the antebellum period, including unfair taxation and unequal constitutional rights. The North’s advantages in finance, population, railroads, manufacturing, technology, and naval assets, among others, are often cited as prohibitively decisive. what if the south won the civil war alternate history Since the north had more people they thought that they should have more people in the senate. Nevertheless, the war remains one of the most misunderstood events in American history. Why was the Civil War Fought? So goes the inevitable response when one brings up the Civil War within earshot of a Confederate apologist. The South started the actual war and then the North chose to fight back. In many areas, cropland was ruined, livestock lost, railroads destroyed, and billions of dollars in slave-related investments wiped out. Songs About Living While Black In The U.S.A. The following are nine of the many arguments that have been put forward for why the Confederacy lost. Each region relied on one another for resources, and when it’s all just one country it is a lot easier to trade around. The Civil War was in reality the War for Southern Independence - freedom from rigid economic controls by northern industrialists who influenced government - NOT an issue of slavery. This was something I, myself, was also surprised to learn in my American Civil War History class when I … That is still 15% too much of people treating those of African decent poorly by whippings, poor living conditions, or selling off family members to other Southern whites. The reasons for the war and its outcome remain hotly debated. The disaffected regions would embrace the Republican party after the Civil War; some remained strongholds well into the twentieth century. Would it be better to say that we could fight a war if 50% or 75% of Southern whites owned slaves? Most of the fighting during the American Civil War took place on Southern soil. Next, another reason that was believed to have caused the Civil War was that the south feared that the north would have the majority of the senate. Seidule clearly and comprehensively explains why the Civil War was, in fact, motivated by the South's desire to preserve slavery. It generally rested on the theory of state sovereignty-- that in the United States the ultimate source of political authority lay in the separate states. Nevertheless, the war remains one of the most misunderstood events in American history. As Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens put it, … It was in South Carolina that the Civil War began, when the Confederacy fired on Fort Sumter. The Confederacy was, Simply put, Too weak to stand by itself on the world stage with a small population, Weak industrial/infastructural base, And over reliance on an agricultural society it could not hope to compete with the powers of Europe at that time. After succession they fired on fort Sumter with no attempts to negotiate first. One main problem was that the states did not have enough power, and the fed was too powerful. Since the North won the war, the federal government has grown in power and now believes it has full authority over state governments. The war was basically about state's rights. What gave Lincoln the right to actively STOP the rebellion. In their best-selling book, The South Was Right!, the Kennedy brothers dispel many commonly held beliefs about the Civil War. The right of property in slaves was recognized by giving to free persons distinct political rights, by giving them the right to represent, and burthening them with direct taxes for three-fifths of their slaves; by authorizing the importation of slaves for twenty years; and by stipulating for the rendition of … The north did not fight to free slaves they fought for total control of the government. The south disagreed with … On the other hand, for the North to win, the Union had to be restored. The south was right and they should have won. For nearly a century, the people and politicians of the Northern and Southern states had been clashing over the issues that finally led to war: economic interests, cultural values, the power of the federal government to control the states, and, most importantly, slavery in American society. As the North chose to abolish slavery without constitutional authority, they embraced the belief that that the end justifies the means, a philosophy that we find later in history with the advent of communism. Many Americans kept on discussing about the beginning of the Civil war. Here are ten basic facts you need to know about America's defining struggle. In waging war, the South faced problems of politics and government that greatly complicated its problem of economic mobilization. Each and every state has a constitutional right to succeed from the union. I only need to put this because I need an other 13 words, 1: Just because someone stops you from doing something, That does not mean that you just go on your own, Especially when they are in charge of you. The South Was Right!, the Kennedy brothers dispel many commonly held beliefs about the Civil War. When antislavery candidate Abraham Lincoln was elected president (1860), the Southern states seceded. Make no mistake, slavery was behind everything that led to the American Civil War. The North's focus was not to end slavery but to preserve the union. Even though the breaking point of the States' Rights argument was the issue of slavery, the states' rights issue has been debated since the beginning of America's Independence, as debated between Hamilton and Jefferson. Slavery undermines the rights and freedoms due to all humans. BatmanoftheJLA. Slavery was permanently abolished in America and the United States was United once again. The discrimination system was really about social class more than skin color. The civil war, however, was not fought on the issue of slavery. States' Rights is seen as one of the major causes of The Civil War. All Rights Reserved. Not only that but not a single slave was freed during the war unless they fought in the armies. The abolition of slavery itself was never a direct Union war aim until 1863 when Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation , declaring freedom for over three million slaves in the South. Few of their leaders even believed they were right. They did not like being in a country that was, they felt, dominated by the North. Civil War broke out in 1861 on the issue of secession. So the poor whites were getting the short end of the deal by supporting slavery or segregation laws. Until the Civil War, Southern presidents and lawmakers had dominated the federal government. If it is, Then it is not a true union at all. Their well-researched arguments demonstrate the South's many legitimate complaints during the antebellum period, including unfair taxation and unequal constitutional rights. Certainly not the constitution. There were many causes of the Civil war, but it is the results that are important. The American Civil War (1861-1865) was one of the bitterest civil wars in the world. The Confederate States were fighting for their right to govern in a manner which would allow the state to survive economically. Ron Paul has made no secret the fact that he thought that the South was right in the Civil War. American Civil War, four-year war (1861–65) fought between the United States and 11 Southern states that seceded to form the Confederate States of America. By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. And certainly the North's main objective was not to abolish slavery, though it was an objective. To some extent yes but not nearly as much as people would have me believe. Beginning as a battle of army versus army, the war became a conflict of society against society. North was mainly industrial and the south agricultural and the north wanted to out law slavery which would be detrimental to the souths agriculture. The South could not have existed for long without the economic and manufacturing might of the North. But tigether thr North &South form a mightier much more stable country, A country that has become one of the major, If not sole, World superpowers. And while it’s true that the North did not go to war to free the slaves — they fought to preserve the union — the South went to war to preserve one states’ right: the right to own slaves. The South seceded before the new Republican government of Abraham Lincoln took any action to restrict slavery in the south or any other institutions of Southern states. Wikimedia Commons A statue of Confederate General Robert E. Lee is removed from its perch in New Orleans on May 19, 2017. As Confederate monuments come down across the South, the Civil War has once again become a lightning rod throughout the United States. On the contrary, It was Ulysses S. Grant who owned slaves during the war, Not Lee. While this may be a worthy aim, It is critical to understand that, As Andrew Jackson said, " the Union cannot be preserved through force. " Unfortunately it was labour intensive and the northern traders were happy to import and sell slaves to the Southern cotton growers. Why did the South Lose the Civil War? During the civil war in the United States, southern states fought to maintain the right to keep slaves, while the north and the President fought to release them to freedom.