Explicitly noob-friendly. LXQt/LXDE vs. Xfce. Gerade im Umgang mit Computern ist es wohl ein menschliches Bedürfnis, technischen Inhalten etwas von ihrer Immaterialität, Abstraktheit oder Fremdheit zu nehmen, indem man sich aus dem Wortschatz der vertrauten Alltagswelt bedient: Mein Zeigegerät ist im wörtlichen Sinn nicht wirklich eine "Maus"; wenn ich im Internet "surfe" bin ich kein Wassersportler; mein "abgestürzter" Rechner ist nicht vom Tisch gefallen ... Ja selbst die grafischen "Oberflächen", von denen Du selbst sprichst, kann ich nicht anfassen. Meines Wissens ist weiterhin lxde Default. Linux Mint MATE. Note that Razor-qt has become LXQt, a port of LXDE to the Qt framework.. fraxinus_63 Level 4 Posts: 217 Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:25 pm. Xfce vs Mate vs Lxde vs LxQT. Many errors. Xfce, Cinnamon, and LXDE are probably your best bets out of the 13 options considered. Packages in xubuntu-desktop - abiword abiword-common abiword-plugin-grammar abiword-plugin-mathview apt-offline blueman brltty-x11 catfish desktop-base exo-utils gigolo Lxqt is probably slightly more lightweight due to its LXDE roots. Put bluntly, LXDE looks basic. So thats how i found manjaro and im right now downloading xfce version for test. Read more... Release screengrab 2.1.0. However, when it comes to comparisons MATE and Xfce, you can go mad. From their official website, we got some comparison point like this : MATE: Stable, robust, traditional; XFCE: Light, simple, efficient; Cinnamon : Sleek, modern, innovative; KDE: Solid, full-featured, polished; 1. Top. 4. In a fresh boot, CPU usage is the same at around 1 percent, but LXDE uses a paltry 219 MB RAM, whereas XFCE uses 465 MB RAM. My Arch system running KDE is using only 505 MB of RAM. Put bluntly, LXDE looks basic. And now i've been thinking to try out something that's not Debian based and its easy at the same time. With enough effort, Xfce can feel like a more modern desktop environment. . Eine weitere Gemeinsamkeit: Lubuntu wie Xubuntu haben … Any distro, any platform! Init-System: Systemd. It follows a traditional desktop paradigm – there’s an application menu with a search function in the bottom left, a system tray in the bottom right, and some icons in the panel for favorite or common applications. Wie verhält sich das, seit Ubuntu-Version 15.10, wo Lubuntu nun LxQt einsetzt? xubuntu-desktop, on the other hand is XFCE + additional packages to improve the user experience. This is a huge deal for those users with very limited RAM. LXQt and LXDE are lighter than Xfce, but that's only part of the story. 750 Artikel, die nur für Xenial getestet sind. That's kinda surprising. Ich würde Xubuntu (anders als xfce für sich genommen) nicht als Leichtgewicht, sondern als "noch schlank" bezeichnen. In fact, LXQt 0.11 even uses slightly less memory than XFCE (with gtk+ 2). GNOME's graphical file manager Files (Nautilus) is intended to be very easy to use and has many features. Top Con ••• Not for everyone. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. I've been using Ubuntu 19.10 on my main computer since 3 days ago. But, whatever the case, you might want to draw up a list of must-have features and see which one has the most of them. Du hast also bis 2019 Zeit und kannst dir dann auch LXQt noch mal ansehen , Systemverwaltung, Installation, Aktualisierung, Vor der Installation und grundlegende Fragen, 2004 – 2020 ubuntuusers.de • Einige Rechte vorbehalten. MATE. Haven't done proper measurements, but if memory serves, the RAM use is similar. This is the testing setup: Debian testing: Clean install in Virtualbox 5.1.6 (2016-10-02) CPU: 2-core; RAM: 512 MB; Resolution: 1024 x 768; Desktop environments: LXQt 0.11, XFCE: 4.12.3, Cinnamon 3, Gnome 3.20 Press J to jump to the feed. lxde vs. lxqt. What about when I … LXQt and LXDE are lighter than Xfce, but that’s only part of the story. 1 year ago. Release Schedule: LTS. It also has slightly fewer configuration features. To put it in simple words, LXDE looks very simple plain. Beitrag von Revod » 19.11.2019 17:37:32 Hallo LX( DE - Qt ) Freunde Das neueste LxQt ( In meine zwei 64 bit Rechner - lxde in meine zwei 32 bit ) an sehr nützliche Funktionalität gewonnen, womit man sehr speditiv arbeiten. Linux Mint Cinnamon vs MATE vs XFCE vs KDE. KDE's file manager Dolphin is described as focused on usability. Auch Manjaro ist … This is where I really begin to see the differences between these two systems. … UpbeatNane's Experience. Was lxqt ausmacht, kann ich nicht beurteilen, aber Xubuntu braucht deutlich mehr Ressourcen als das bisherige Lubuntu insbesondere wegen der Gnome-Anteile, die es komfortabel, aber auch fetter machen. Linux Mint MATE is consuming a very low usage of memory. A review of MATE, Xfce, LXDE, LXQt, Budgie, Lumina, and Moksha. See More. Ubuntu nutzt standardmäßig die Desktopumgebung Gnome, Lubuntu LXQt (vormals LXDE) und Xubuntu Xfce. The primary difference between LXQt and Xfce is that LXQt uses Qt rather than GTK+. XFCE was never as memory efficient as people claimed. Re: Linux Mint LXQt. It is a desktop environment best suited for those looking for a traditional, seamlessly working desktop. Comparison of the best lightweight Linux desktop environments. If you prefer a software Qt and you need a less loaded desktop, LXQt is easy. The LXDE and LXQt desktops feel like they've been around forever, gliding through user actions with ease, finding just the right balance between explanatory prompts and minimal design. One of the features of LXQt is that it has comparatively low resource requirements. A fork of GNOME 2, MATE had its latest stable release 1.22 on March 18th, 2019 (as of October 2019). Xfce uses less resources, but this advantage begins to break down as you install and run apps that depend on GNOME libraries. What is the difference between xfce4 and xubuntu-desktop packages? The primary difference between LXQt and Xfce is that LXQt uses Qt rather than GTK+. Read more... Release qtermwidget 0.16.0. Letztlich wird der Rechner nicht dicker oder dünner bzw. Their basic difference lies in the fact that LXQT makes the use of Qt and not GTK+. "Low system resource consumption" is the primary reason people pick Xfce over the competition. Its infrastructure has been around for years, which means that MATE has been thoroughly tested and is thus less prone … xfce takes up 300mb ona new arch install and lxqt around 500 on a new arch install, oc that varies but thats what i got on the same laptop with fresh installs, That’s not that big a difference, but then again, if the laptop is something low end, it could be the difference between usable and barely usable, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the linux4noobs community. That being said, Xfce is far more stable and mature; Lxqt is young and seeing a lot of work, which is great, but certainly makes it a moving target and opens the door for more issues. LXDE vs. XFCE System Resource Efficiency. Und zum eigentlichen Thema dieses Threads: Ich habe mir vor einigen Wochen LXQT mal testweise installiert und fand's eher grauslich. Questions are encouraged. It appears to be a great choice for weak old laptops and things like that. When I say 'Xfce,' it’s a good bet you think about a lean, responsive Linux desktop environment that’s particularly light on system memory usage. If you install the xfce4 package, you just get the Xfce desktop and some basic packages included in the Xfce desktop such as Thunar file manager. The LXQt team is proud to announce the release of screengrab 2.1.0. And is one more stable than the other? Xfce vs. MATE. Bevor die Unterstützung für LXDE-Lubuntu ausläuft (2017), werde ich mich vermutlich nach einer alternativen "schlanken" Distribution umschauen müssen. As XFCE is slowly dying, and LXDE is merging with Razor-qt, LXQt becomes a very attractive options for all those who wish to use a desktop envrionment that is light on ressources. LXQt is much the same as LXDE, as you may guess from the name. Xfce is light on resources but proves to provide a feature-rich user experience. I use peppermint. It has quite cool combination of LXDE and XFCE. Ich würde Xubuntu (anders als xfce für sich genommen) nicht als Leichtgewicht, sondern als "noch schlank" bezeichnen. It consumes around 380mb ram on boot. The LXQt team is proud to announce the release of LXQt 0.16.0, the Lightweight Qt Desktop Environment. Wie verhält sich das, seit Ubuntu-Version 15.10, wo Lubuntu nun LxQt einsetzt? It just so happens that I recently tried these as well as lxqt in antiX running from a usb with persistence enabled and while lxde, enlightenment and lxqt used much less RAM (around 300mb) they don't compare with xfce when it comes to ease of use and customization (at least for me). Aktuell gibt es im Wiki ca. Today, XFCE is really the only option if you want a very functional light-weight desktop. 16.04 wird weiterhin auf LXDE setzen. Es heißt ja LXDE (Lubuntu) wäre dezent weniger anspruchsvoll bei den Ressourcen als Xfce (was selbst auch nicht besonders anspruchsvoll ist). Der Ressourcenverbrauch ist überdies höher als bei LXDE, in etwa wohl vergleichbar mit XFCE. Xfce vs Mate vs Lxde vs LxQT. leichter oder schwerer. Easy on the specs and still blazingly fast. XFCE is only the desktop environment. It’s certainly lightweight and faster than Gnome or KDE which used to take _ages_ to load on that 2012 era laptop of mine, which I use for such experiments. This page is powered by a knowledgeable community that helps you make an informed decision. As to stability, that's hard to test. Neben dem Standarddesktop Gnome 3 stehen KDE, XFCE, LXQT, Mate, Cinnamon und LXDE in installierbaren Livesystemen zur Verfügung. sagen, das nun Xfce hier den geringsten Anspruch hat, weil LxQt durch Qt nun etwas mehr benötigt? Comparison of ease of use and stability. Unlike LXQt, you will find a lot of major Linux distributions support XFCE editions. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. LXQt/LXDE vs. Xfce. Completely trash. Out of the box, MATE has more features than Xfce, but it is more difficult to configure. Etwas offtopic, aber ich finds immer witzig, dass die grafischen Oberflächen mit Masseneinheiten verglichen werden. Such differences might matter immensely if you are a compulsive customizer, or not at all if you tend to accept your desktop environment the way you find it. I haven't had stability issues with either. Top Pro ••• Great for low performance hardware. Archived. Weniger Ressourcenverbrauch ist ja als Argument ok, aber der Rest , Ohne Metaphern wären unsere Sprache aber doch um einiges ärmer. LXDE vs Xfce Xfce is not as light as LXDE and LXQT. XFCE runs at around 650MB on my Debian system and LXQT uses around 1GB of RAM. Xfce can also surprise you with features like custom actions in the file manager. The release can be downloaded from Github. LXQt has less panel applications than Xfce and the default openbox window manager does not have compositing. I have them both installed but I use XFCE more due to the customization. Default Desktop Environment: Budgie, Cinnamon, Deepin, GNOME, i3, KDE Plasma, LXQt, MATE, Xfce. If you prefer GTK+, you’re better off using Xfce. See All Specs. I personally like LXQt for my gaming PC though. 10% aller Wikiartikel. Eine besondere Hürde stellen Metaphern übrigens ironischerweise gerade für Projekte der Künstlichen Intelligenz dar, die Computern das Verstehen natürlicher Sprachen beizubringen versuchen. Cookies help us deliver our Services. Posted by 1 year ago. I tried LXQt with Fedora by manually installing it over a Fedora LXDE installation. The LXQt team is proud to announce the release of qtermwidget 0.16.0. After cold boot, LXQt uses 112 MB in the testing environment. Back in the GNOME 2 days, it was a littlelighter, but if you wanted it to do everything that GNOME could, it ended up being roughly just as heavy. Well, if they are about the same for resource usage (which is pretty good and lightweight), then I guess it’s up to personal preference when it comes to deciding between LXQT and XFCE. So, I guess that's my question here, will Linux Mint LXQt become a reality, or is it only wishful thinking? XFCE runs at around 650MB on my Debian system and LXQT uses around 1GB of RAM. Könnte man evtl. Close. Both desktop environments claim to be lightweight, but which one is more lightweight? I have them both installed but I use XFCE more due to the customization. LXQt with Openbox appears to be really light and uses barely more than 220 MB RAM. On the other hand, Xfce gives you the feel of a modern environment of the desktop. There’s also a workspace switcher, giving a layer of user experience that not every DE does. In my opinion, Xfce provides a nice balance between functionality and conservation of system resources, while still having a beautiful desktop. With enough effort, Xfce can feel like a more modern desktop environment. Ich würde Xubuntu (anders als xfce für sich genommen) nicht als Leichtgewicht, sondern als "noch schlank" bezeichnen. If you need a performance-centric desktop environment without needing advanced customizations, Xfce is a great choice to go with. Xfce - Less resource-hungry than GNOME or KDE, Xfce is a great choice for older computers, and it is still a full-fledged desktop environment that offers a great deal to the user. I also had problems with Falcon browser, but that might have been the OS, or just Falcon browser - maybe the rest of the OS is fine. Xfce: The Mint implementation of Xfce is beautiful right out of the box, and it has all the features I want or need, with the exception of the multiple-monitor management provided by Cinnamon. I'd guess XFCE just because it's older. I have used the Xfce desktop in Mint for many years, and it remains my choice in LM 19. Da heißt es weiter warten.... Verdict and conclusion. Installing Xfce on Ubuntu will turn it into Xubuntu, won’t it? The rest of the things remain the same. All the default settings are sensible, and 90% of what most users need to do on a desktop is covered (I'm reserving a conservative 10% for unique personal tastes that nobody expects any desktop to guess). However, this is not the only deciding factor. See More. Linux introductions, tips and tutorials. Damit diese im nächsten Frühjahr nicht alle archiviert werden müssen, ist eure Mithilfe gefragt! If you prefer GTK+, you're better off using Xfce. Was lxqt ausmacht, kann ich nicht beurteilen, aber Xubuntu braucht deutlich mehr Ressourcen als das bisherige Lubuntu insbesondere wegen der Gnome-Anteile, die es komfortabel, aber auch fetter machen. The objective of this guide is to install LXQt desktop as an alternative desktop environment for Ubuntu 20.04 Focal Fossa Desktop/Server Linux. Dies entspricht ca.