Another company is shutting its doors at one of its unionized facilties—and 91 unionized workers may soon be unemployed.
In a press release, Bradken–an Austrialia-based company–announced that, due to “softer market conditions” served by its Chehalis, Washington facility, it would be consolidating its Chehalis operations into other Bradken facilties.
The announcement comes after the plant had been embroiled in a bitter contract and legal dispute with the International Association of Machinists (IAM) for nearly two years—and a mere three months following Barack Obama’s pro-union appointees’ refusal to count the workers’ ballots in a decertification election.
Disregarding its own long-standing precedent, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has issued an order that continues the impoundment of Bradken, Inc. workers’ ballots cast to determine whether the workers want to remove a local Machinist union from their workplace.
The NLRB’s ruling endangers the results of an election initiated by Jonathan Fuller and his coworkers at the steel manufacturing facility to determine whether to remove the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM) District W24 union as their monopoly bargaining representative. Fuller is receiving free legal assistance from National Right to Work Foundation staff attorneys.
On August 16, 2013, IAM union officials filed federal charges against Bradken during a contract dispute. On August 30, 2013, Fuller and his coworkers filed a petition seeking a decertification election to determine their union representation. On April 23, 2014, an NLRB Regional Director approved an agreement between IAM and Bradken officials that settled the union’s charges with no admission of liability by Bradken. On June 5, the Regional Director ruled based on long-standing NLRB precedent that the facility’s approximately ninety-eight workers could vote in a decertification election, which was held on July 1 despite IAM union officials’ objections.
However, IAM union officials asked the NLRB in Washington, DC to review the Regional Director’s decision allowing the election, causing the NLRB to impound the workers’ ballots. IAM union lawyers argue that the Board should overturn the precedent that permits workers’ decertification elections when union unfair labor practice charges are settled without an employer admission of wrongdoing.
On October 10, a three-member panel of the Board issued a 2-1 order granting the IAM’s request for review, thereby leaving impounded the workers’ ballots. By not counting the ballots the NLRB leaves the union in place even though a majority of workers may have voted it out over a year ago. The grant of review signals the NLRB majority’s embrace of the union officials’ position that the ballots should be destroyed and the vote ruled invalid even though there is no current Board precedent for doing so under these circumstances. [Emphasis added.]
Perhaps it is a mere coincidence but one must wonder whether the company’s business decision was influenced at all by the difficulties it encountered with the Machinists union and Obama’s NLRB.
Related:
